This study analyzes the reasons why should legalize marijuana.
The ameliorative reach of reparatory legalization should not be limited to those with the capacity to open marijuana businesses; rather, a reparatory regulatory framework should also utilize tax revenue from the marijuana industry to compensate those who lack such a capacity. In addition to increasing the representation of those harmed by the drug war in the legal marijuana trade, reparatory legalization advocates should consider direct financial compensation to those formerly arrested and incarcerated for marijuana offenses. Such a model circumvents the obstacles attendant to business ownership in the marijuana industry. This compensation could take the form of a direct cash transfer upon verification that a person was convicted of a marijuana offense in the United States, and could be funded by a tax on marijuana sales. In addition to a moral signaling effect that addresses the illegitimacy of prohibition, cash payments directly accomplish one of the key goals of Senator Booker’s Community Reinvestment Fund: injecting wealth into communities hit hardest by marijuana prohibition.
To address this threat of widening inequality caused by the legal marijuana market, those interested in reparatory legalization should take lessons from recent state efforts. While an explicit racial preference may not be feasible, a race-neutral approach to distributing marijuana dispensary permits that uses former arrests and geography as proxies may provide a fruitful avenue for mitigating those inequalities. For example, California’s Proposition 64, a state ballot measure that pairs legalization with a regulatory framework, laid the groundwork for Oakland’s Equity Permit Program, a local initiative that gives preference in the marijuana permit process to those negatively affected by marijuana prohibition. Under the equity program, half of the available permits are set aside for below-medium income Oakland residents who were convicted of a marijuana offense in the last twenty years or who, during that same period, lived for at least ten years in the areas of Oakland most affected by arrests for marijuana offenses. Those interested in reparatory legalization should look with interest at whether this program diversifies the class of entrepreneurs reaping the benefits of legalization. The successes and challenges of the implementation of this measure may provide a model for future legalization efforts.
That was in the first year alone, it goes to show that legalizing marijuana was a vital move for Colorado.
Since these states have legalized weed for recreational use, it also helps the state regulate what types of weed is being bought and sold within the state lines, and can make sure that people are being safe with the use of marijuana.
Colorado, being the first state to legalize marijuana, is what other states that have now legalized marijuana as well base off of because they are so successful, along with making over a billion dollars of marijuana, it has also created over 20,000 jobs and the unemployment has decreased significantly.
("Why the United States Government Should Not Legalize Marijuana.")
Notably absent from Senator Booker’s proposal is a provision for the regulation of legalized marijuana markets. Without a reparatory regulatory framework, the Act is missing an important opportunity to remediate further the harms of marijuana prohibition. In failing to account for the money that will be generated by the legal marijuana markets, Senator Booker leaves behind a key tool in accomplishing his proposal’s goals of bridging racial and economic inequality. Current markets in the states that have legalized marijuana teach us that without state intervention, the black and Latino victims of marijuana prohibition are unlikely to benefit from the wealth attendant to the newly permissive environments. Reparatory legalization advocates should seek regulatory frameworks that increase the representation of these populations in the legalized marijuana market and should consider the prospect of direct cash transfers to those incarcerated for marijuana offenses.
However, it should be written not to generalize everything, but to explain the topic to the end and give the reader some food for thought after they finish reading your marijuana legalization paper.
As this topic is relatively new, there won’t be too many essays on why marijuana should be legalized, giving you all the cards that you need to make your essay outstanding.
The key to being a successful advocate of ending cannabis prohibition is effective communication. Specifically, advocates must be able to: 1) convey the most important arguments in support of legalizing, regulating, and taxing cannabis, and 2) respond to arguments made in opposition to legalization. Whether you are engaging in personal discussions, participating in public debates, conducting media interviews, or corresponding with government officials, it is critical that you are prepared.
This document will provide you with the most persuasive talking points and strongest rebuttals to employ when communicating about the benefits of replacing cannabis prohibition with a system of regulating and taxing cannabis for adults. We recommend you keep it handy when conducting interviews or engaging in public debates. You are welcome to convey the information verbatim or simply use it as a general guide when carrying out advocacy activities.
NOTE: New statistics and studies are constantly emerging. If you would like to confirm whether a given piece of information is current, or if you would like to suggest additions or revisions to this document, please contact the Marijuana Policy Project communications department at .
Some information was adapted from Marijuana Is Safer: So why are we driving people to drink? (Chelsea Green, July 2013) by Steve Fox, Paul Armentano, and Mason Tvert.
🌱 Reasons why marijuana should be legalized essay.
Having a marijuana conviction on your record can make it difficult to secure and maintain employment, housing, or secure government assistance for the . This is why clearing people’s records of marijuana convictions is a necessary addition to any legalization measure. If we believe that marijuana is not worthy of criminal intervention, then it is only right we stop the suffering inflicted on people by a marijuana prosecution. Especially since we know this disproportionately falls on the shoulders, and families, of low-income communities and communities of color.
Should Marijuana be Legalized for Medical Purposes Essay.
Concerns about how the federal government would react to the new laws were lessened somewhat with a 2013 communication from President Obama’s Justice Department known as the Cole memo. Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole stated that as long as states had good regulations, then the federal government would hold off on challenging marijuana legalization. As a result, marijuana retail stores opened in Colorado on Jan. 1, 2014, allowing adults 21 and older to purchase cannabis that is taxed and regulated under state law. Washington’s marijuana shops opened on July 8, 2014.
3 Reasons Why Marijuana Should Be Legalized...or Not?!
Pro-cannabis groups support marijuana legalization, and they have gained traction as demonstrated by state-level policies and public opinion polls. The main argument for the widespread legalization of cannabis is that it helps treat specified serious conditions, especially when symptoms do not respond to other treatments. Beneficial cannabinoids or their derivatives, such as cannabidiol, have been shown to be safe, effective, and inexpensive therapies for chronic pain and neurodegenerative disorders compared to other agents (Bridgeman & Abazia, 2017). Thus, proponents support a legal prescription of medicinal cannabis therapy for specific conditions.
10 Reasons Why Marijuana Should Be Legal - Stoner Things.
A policy of decriminalization was adopted in the Netherlands in 1976 for what the country deemed “soft drugs,” which included cannabis. Under the Dutch Opium Act, possession of less than five grams of marijuana is presumed to be for personal use and is therefore not prosecuted. The law also allows for coffee shops where people are able to buy and use cannabis. Decriminalization of marijuana means people don’t get arrested for possessing small amounts of marijuana, but instead may be required to pay a civil fine rather than facing criminal charges. This is a step towards loosening marijuana prohibition, but is not considered to be legalization. Some marijuana legalization opponents advocate for decriminalization instead.